. . . it has been demonstrated that most publics in the Arab world see parliamentary democracy as the most suitable political system going forward. They are thus rejecting the Leninist critique of parliaments as mere tools of oppression by the rich and as ultimately undemocratic because only representative– a critique that had been taken into both leftist and Muslim fundamentalist Arab ideologies. The dream of direct democracy has over and over again revealed itself to be a mere illusion enabling a ferocious dictatorship. Qaddafi even maintained that he had stepped down from power and wasn’t ruling, an absurd assertion credited by his more gullible useful idiots in the West. No one has suffered more from the anti-democratic utopianism of the twentieth century, which most Arab countries implemented on becoming independent from their colonial masters (the British, French and Italians). But the age of dictators and Supreme Guides who incarnated at once the will of the people and the will of God is passing in the Middle East, leaving authoritarian movements like al-Qaeda in the dust of history. [...]I'm so relieved. Maybe I'll invite Qaradawi for a beer.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Juan Cole: That's about it for "authoritarian movements" in the Middle East
Juan is awfully optimistic in a post entitled: "Ten Years after 9/11, Do the Arabs value Democracy more than We do?":
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment