Must-read post from Richard Millet on trial of "Anti-Ahava activists"

He does a good job of summarizing the jaw-dropping and semi-farcical proceedings. The denizens of that part of the political spectrum regularly used to call Tony Blair a "war criminal," so if their arguments are valid, what would stop them from ignoring any laws against trespassing, creating a public nuisance, etc. in order to target any business or any other institution that meets with their ire? It should be an open-and-shut case, but it probably won't be considering the current political climate in Britain and much of the rest of Europe.